AI-verified hiring
When AI shapes every first impression, hiring teams need evidence of the person behind it.
See the product first. Explore the demo in minutes, on your own time.
Live evidence workspace
148,000+
More than 148,000 WISE assessments distributed, developed by our founder, Dr. Richie T. Kim.
15+
15+ years of experience developing psychometric assessments.
Focus
One standard: job-relevant evidence for AI-influenced hiring.
Two independent engines
We turn your job description into newly generated situational judgment scenarios for that role, rather than relying on an off-the-shelf item bank. Then choose the engine that fits the hiring decision.
Shared input for both engines
Define the role, then generate new situational judgment scenarios from its competencies, decision conditions, and risks. Theta AI™ and Titan AI™ each start from this same role brief.
For large cohorts
Screen a large candidate pool with role-specific scenarios, consistent comparison, and cohort context.
For smaller groups
Verify a smaller candidate group in depth with targeted follow-up on judgment and reasoning.
Optional
If you choose both engines, Theta AI™ evidence can focus Titan AI™'s follow-up. Neither engine requires the other.
With either engine, your hiring team reviews the evidence and makes the final decision.
How Titan AI™ tests judgment
Every Titan AI™ scenario is written from your job description. The candidate explains their approach in their own words, and follow-up questions press on the reasoning.
Scenarios are generated from your job description, not pulled from a generic item bank.
The candidate answers in free text, and targeted follow-up tests the reasoning, so a polished first sentence is not the whole story.
The role brief, the candidate's answers, the follow-up, and reviewer history stay linked in the portal.
The dual engine
Theta AI™ screens large cohorts. Titan AI™ verifies smaller groups in depth. Each engine stands alone; if you use both, the evidence stays in one trail.
IRT
Role-linked scoring
EAP
Candidate-level estimate
Review
Human decision boundary
Structured screening
Adaptive evidence
Evidence workspace
Candidate evidence
Structured signal
IRT-scored
Adaptive evidence
Job-scenario interview
A deliberate boundary
Reports organize the evidence. Hiring teams retain the context, accountability, and final say.
Shared input
The job defines the evidence that matters.
Theta AI™
Theta AI™ compares structured responses and surfaces patterns for review.
Titan AI™
Titan AI™ uses targeted follow-up questions to test the reasoning beyond a polished first response.
Integrity, handled carefully
Every engine
The hiring team keeps accountability.
Ready when the decision matters
